What is the proper way to write a Tukey post-hoc result?

There are several examples with different results?

Say you have North, South, East and West.

`North N=50 Mean=2.45 SD=3.9 std error=.577 LB=1.29 UB=3.62 South N=40 Mean=2.54 SD=3.8 std error=.576 LB=1.29 UB=3.63 East N=55 Mean=3.45 SD=3.7 std error=.575 LB=1.29 UB=3.64 West N=45 Mean=3.54 SD=3.6 std error=.574 LB=1.29 UB=3.65`

North is statistically significant with East (sig=.009) and West(sig= .040) but not South (sig=.450).

East is statistically significant with South(.049).

**Answer**

### General strategy of article deconstruction

A general strategy for learning how to write up results involves finding and deconstructing an example publication. I like to call this article deconstruction. A simple way of doing this involves searching Google Scholar to find a few examples. You may want to limit your search to good journals in your area (e.g., “tukey post hoc social psychology”). Then extract a few writing principles.

### Example write up of post-hoc test

Here’s one example of a write-up of a post-hoc test from a social psychology context:

The article includes a table of means and standard deviations for each condition for a set of dependent variables.

In the text it has the following:

An analysis of variance (ANOVA) on these scores again yielded

significant variation among conditions, F(2, 37) = 4.29, p < .03. A

post hoc Tukey test showed that the future alone and future belonging

groups differed significantly at p < .05; the misfortune control group

was not significantly different from the other two groups, lying

somewhere in the middle.

— Baumeister RF, Twenge JM, Nuss CK. (2002). Effects of social exclusion on cognitive processes: anticipated aloneness reduces intelligent thought. *Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83*, 817-27.

### Extract writing principles

- Present a table of means and standard deviations
- First report overall ANOVA
- Then report which pairs were significantly different at a given alpha level
- Then report which pairs were not significantly different.

Of course, a post-hoc test could be written up in other ways; for example, you could use a graph of means rather than a table; or you could incorporate post-hoc test results into a table using the a \le b<c style notation (a,b,c,... correspond to groups); but at least by taking a good example, you have a starting point.

**Attribution***Source : Link , Question Author : Sue , Answer Author : Jeromy Anglim*