In sports modelling, are hot simulations better or cold simulations?

I’m thinking here largely of the context in which someone has an Elo rating model for a particular sport.

To calculate things such as how often the team makes the Finals series, or wins the Championship game, modellers might run Monte Carlo simulations of the entire season. Some modellers (e.g. FiveThirtyEight, at least with respect to their sports simulations as of 2015) run their simulations hot, in the sense that a team’s rating changes dynamically during the simulated season based on the results of the simulated games. Other modellers run their simulations cold, meaning that the rating at the commencement of the simulated season stays static irrespective of the results of the simulated games.

What’s better, and why?

Answer

Attribution
Source : Link , Question Author : user1205901 – Слава Україні , Answer Author : Community

Leave a Comment